[ad_1]
On the Communications of the ACM website website, Bertrand Meyer argues that (opposite to the exploding buzz) AI Does Not Support Programmers:
As a programmer, I know wherever to go to remedy a difficulty. But I am fallible I would appreciate to have an assistant who retains me in examine, alerting me to pitfalls and correcting me when I err. A productive pair-programmer. But that is not what I get. Alternatively, I have the equivalent of a cocky graduate university student, smart and widely read through, also well mannered and swift to apologize, but totally, invariably, sloppy and unreliable. I have small use for these types of supposed enable.
Not incredibly, my experience is pretty close to what he’s describing. AI is the way to go if you want something that seems to be affordable (at a 1st glance), but not if you want to get something right. Regrettably, there is a little bit of a distinction between advertising and engineering: networks that are configured 90% properly at times are unsuccessful to do what you assume them to do.
[ad_2]
Resource link