[ad_1]
One of my visitors despatched me this (paraphrased) issue:
What I have viewed in my community are multicast packets with the IP supply tackle set to … and source port set to . Is that deemed appropriate? Could I use a multicast IP handle as a source deal with?
TL&DR: **** NO!!!
It also seemed like a very good dilemma to examination ChatGPT, and this time it did a fairly very good task.
What must be the supply IP handle in an IPv4 multicast packet?
In an IPv4 multicast packet, the resource IP deal with should be the IP handle of the system (sender) that is making the multicast site visitors. This handle really should be a valid unicast IP deal with assigned to the sender’s community interface. The source IP tackle need to not be a multicast tackle (i.e., in the array of 224… to 239.255.255.255), as multicast addresses are reserved for place (team) addresses in multicast interaction.
In summary, the source IP deal with in an IPv4 multicast packet need to be the unicast IP deal with of the sender, when the vacation spot IP tackle must be a valid multicast tackle representing the multicast group to which the packet is being despatched.
Why can’t I use a multicast IP deal with as the supply IP tackle?
Making use of a multicast IP tackle as the supply IP tackle in a multicast packet is not authorized for numerous motives:
- Tackle ambiguity: Multicast addresses are employed to determine multicast teams, not particular person devices. If a multicast tackle have been utilised as the source IP deal with, it would develop ambiguity, as several gadgets could be linked with that handle. The receiving products wouldn’t be able to identify the particular sender or respond to the sender properly.
- Routing and forwarding problems: Community equipment, such as routers and switches, are designed to deal with multicast visitors dependent on spot multicast addresses. Making use of a multicast address as the supply deal with would possible cause routing and forwarding problems, as network units would not know how to manage these packets properly.
- Protocol style and design: IP multicast protocols, this kind of as Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) and Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM), are developed with the assumption that resource addresses are unicast IP addresses. Employing multicast addresses as source IP addresses could lead to surprising actions or faults in these protocols.
- Safety considerations: Making it possible for multicast IP addresses as resource addresses could allow probable spoofing attacks or create other stability vulnerabilities.
By utilizing unicast IP addresses as resource addresses in multicast packets, these issues are avoided, and the IP multicast program can operate the right way and successfully.
Can I use IP deal with … as the resource IP handle?
Using the IP address … as the source IP handle in a packet is usually not suggested for normal interaction. The handle … is a specific reserved tackle known as the “unspecified handle,” and it has a certain meaning in unique contexts:
- When a machine is to start with initializing its IP stack and does not nonetheless have a valid IP address assigned, it may use … as the resource IP deal with in precise cases, these as DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) requests. In this circumstance, the machine is essentially saying, “I really do not have an IP address nonetheless, you should offer me one particular.”
- In some programming or program contexts, … is utilised as a wildcard to show that a server ought to hear on all readily available community interfaces and IP addresses.
For typical communication, using … as the resource IP address is not acceptable, as it doesn’t uniquely establish the sender. Other units on the community will not be in a position to interpret the supply of the packet or react to it effectively. Rather, you must use a valid unicast IP deal with assigned to the sender’s community interface as the resource IP address.
The only issue it skipped is the Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) examine – when deciding where to forward a multicast packet, an IP router will never ever ship it onto the interfaces that can be applied to attain the sender, as a result breaking forwarding loops additional proficiently than blocking the hyperlinks. An IP router will also fall incoming multicast packets if the source IP address of the incoming packet cannot be attained through the incoming interface.
The RPF verify efficiently blocks the propagation of IP multicast packets with the resource IP address established to … further than the very first router, which might explain why an overly smart developer might have made the decision to use them when making an attempt to fix the “how do we make sure this stuff never ever escapes into the wild” challenge as an alternative of figuring out how to use MAC-degree multicasts.
In any case, one particular has to marvel what will make folks inquire these weird concerns. In this scenario, my reader observed a community machine sending multicast packets with all-zeroes resource IP deal with as a heartbeat involving cluster customers. With that information and facts, it was not really hard to come across a potential perpetrator, for instance the Checkpoint firewalls.
I utilized the following image in a website publish in 2015. Unfortunately it is equally acceptable virtually a 10 years later on. Some stupidities never adjust.
Revision Heritage
- 2023-06-01
- Rewrote the effect of RPF check out portion of the web site write-up dependent on the feed-back from Erik Auerswald.
[ad_2]
Resource link